The unexamined life is not worth living” Apology | Socrates (470 -399 BC) |
Although
Socrates
famously claimed to know nothing, he clearly did believe that it
was important to understand the meaning of the words you used.
What’s more he
used a
method, the elenchus (literally: refutation) which we can use
today in
our quest for wisdom. The elenchus
can be summarised in 4 steps:-
1.
Think of a word or concept that is in need of clarification
The
elenchus is best suited to disputed, ambiguous, ethical terms (like
tolerance, or the good life).
2.
Offer a provisional definition
Not
just a synonym, but an account that helps
distinguish cases of X from cases which aren’t X, and which will help
us attain
X. The definition will provide
Necessary
conditions -
prerequisites e.g. to be reading this, you need to be human
Sufficient
conditions - guarantees
e.g. being unmarried and male are
jointly sufficient for being a bachelor.
3.
Try to refute the definition
Look
for exceptions, which can be either:
i)
Examples which are cases of X but which don’t fit this definition
ii)
Examples which fit this definition but aren’t examples of X
4.
Refine or alter the definition to take into account the exceptions
If
you can adapt your definition – else start from scratch. Continue until
you can
find no exceptions!